Já tivemos. Não gostámos. Chamava-se imprensa nacionalizada

Será uma solução boa para todos .
Os jornalistas não têm de se preocupar com noticias , basta emitirem opinião ,que é quase sempre no mesmo sentido , e receber o salário vindo do OE , sem temores com vendas , e publicidade .
Os accionistas passam a tratar apenas da grande distribuição, ou venda de tarifas e telemoveis , pois isso sempre dará em Portugal ( esperto … largou os contraplacados a tempo ), isto até alguem se lembrar que fixar preços para os bens de consumo corrente é afinal uma boa ideia .Ou criar as “Lojas Chavez” com vouchers , e carnets de descontos por numero de participação no movimento social associativo ou nas manifestações de apoio ao governo.
Uma boa ideia .

GostarGostar

Esta é uma noticia muito boa , e nunca vai passar no Publico da Xandra Lucas

(CNN)—Hundreds of thousands of migrants are pounding on Europe’s invisible doors — dirty, exhausted and desperate to escape the daily carnage in their homelands.

But their arrival also puts a strain on European resources. Germany expects to take in 800,000 refugees and says it will spend at least 6 billion euros ($6.7 billion). Austria, which received 16,000 migrants in just two days, said it won’t be able to keep up with this pace.

At the same time, several oil-rich Arab nations closer to the conflict zones have come under harsh criticism because they’ve taken in virtually no refugees.

So are countries obligated to house refugees? If so, why?

For the most part, it boils down to an international treaty.

What does the treaty say?


The 1951 Refugee Convention was adopted after World War II, when hundreds of thousands of refugees were displaced across Europe.

The treaty defines what refugees are — those who is seeking refuge from persecution. It also gives them a very important right — the right to not be sent back home into harm’s way, except under extreme circumstances.

“Since, by definition, refugees are not protected by their own governments, the international community steps in to ensure they are safe and protected,” said the UNHCR, the United Nations’ refugee agency.

The treaty was amended in 1967, in part to include refugees from around the world.

And according to the provisions, “refugees deserve, as a minimum, the same standards of treatment enjoyed by other foreign nationals in a given country and, in many cases, the same treatment as nationals,” the UNHCR said.

The agency said more than 50 million refugees have been resettled.

Why migrants head to the Mediterranean

Who has signed on to the treaty?

Hungary is one of the signatories. But it has been criticized by migrants and activists who say refugees are left in decrepit conditions as they await transfer. Now, Hungary is erecting a fence at the Serbian border to help control the flow of migrants.

Countries outside of Europe are also stepping up to handle the current flood of refugees. Venezuela, which signed on to the 1967 protocol, said it will take in 20,000 refugees. Australia said it has absorbed 4,500 refugees from Syria and Iraq over the past year.

Noticeably absent from the list: the Gulf states of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates.

How you can help in the migrant crisis

How many refugees has Europe taken in this year?
Well over 366,000 refugees have crossed the Mediterranean Sea to Europe this year, the UNHCR said. Another 2,800 attempted the journey, but either died or disappeared.

The vast majority of refugees come from three countries: Iraq, where migrants are fleeing the brutality of ISIS; Afghanistan, which has been devastated by war; and Syria, where civilians are grappling with both ISIS and indiscriminate attacks in the country’s civil war.

What rights do refugees have?
In addition to not getting sent back to their home countries, refugees have several other rights, including:

– The right to not be punished for illegally entering countries that signed on to the treaty

– The right to housing



– Access to education

– Access to public assistance

– Access to courts

– The right to get identification and travel documents

Why aren’t Gulf countries taking in refugees?
Since oil-rich Gulf states are close to Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, they’d help absorb some of the refugees, right?

Wrong.

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates have each given millions of dollars to the United Nations to help Syrian refugees. But they haven’t housed any of them, according to Amnesty International.

“We’ve been asking that not only the borders of the region are open, but that all other borders — especially in the developed world — are also open,” said Antonio Guterres, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.

Abdul Khaleq Abdulla, a retired professor from United Arab Emirates University, said Gulf states have security on their minds.



Gulf states offer little physical support to migrants

“Having refugees also feeds into ISIS’ appeal,” Abdulla said. “And it feeds into the violence in the region, which is already the most violent region on Earth. So all in all, anything that goes in the neighborhood impacts the security and the stability of the Arab Gulf states who are by far the most stable and the most secure.”

And those Gulf states aren’t party to the international treaty — so technically, they don’t have to help.

Things to know about Europe’s migrant crisis

CNN’s Becky Anderson and Arwa Damon contributed to this report

” technically , they don`t have to help “. … how nice … how can anyone be more direct on the subject

GostarGostar

Eu cá sou de opinião que todas as madrassas e respectivos madrasseiros/as deverão encerrar…

GostarGostar

Esta gaja é uma cómica… Não conte com a minha massa para a manter a escrevinhar merdas como esta e odes ao porco preto e restante escumalha do peiésse e berloque. Mas não conte mesmo. Nem ela nem os da “nossa” TAP (só se deixar mesmo de ser “nossa”), nem os da “nossa” CP, nem os da “nossa” Carris, etc. Os da “nossa” RTP vai ter que ser enquanto não quiser ler à luz da vela à noite.

GostarLiked by 1 person

O minha senhora, se quer escrever o que lhe vem à cabeça e não ter de se preocupar com o facto de alguém querer pagar para a ler, então venha aqui para caixas dos blogs.
Agora querer massa para produzir inutilidades é que não, já nos chega a corja de criadores de filmes manhosos que recebem milhões para fazerem campanhas pela TAP e filmarem fitas cujo único interesse são as mamocas das moçoilas.

GostarLiked by 1 person

Se existe uma TV pública também pode haver um jornal público. Basta aumentar um pouco mais a taxa audiovisual.

GostarGostar