Main Street Pans Bailout, Says Bankers Get `What They Deserve’
By Chris Dolmetsch
Sept. 30 (Bloomberg) — Main Street thinks even less of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout plan than the U.S. House of Representatives, which defeated it yesterday.
“This thing they’re talking about is only going to make the rich richer,” said Paul Clancy, 30, a window washer who for 15 years has scrubbed panes on some of Boston’s largest financial edifices. “Leave them be, and they’ll get what they deserve. Nobody helps me if I’m in trouble.”
The plan would benefit “a bunch of rich good old boys,” said Seattle bicycle messenger Mark Pilder, 39, on a break from his downtown deliveries. “They’re not going to lose money. They’re shifting the burden to taxpayers. The ones actually making the decisions aren’t in danger of losing any money.”
Pilder said he may lose business from the global credit crisis because many of his deliveries go to the headquarters of Washington Mutual Inc., which was taken over by the federal government last week in the largest bank failure in U.S. history.
In Wilmington, street vendor Jeff Buckwalter, 55, said he agreed that a bailout is needed but, “I can’t just see giving Wall Street $700 billion.”
A bolha rebenta quando o banco central sobe as taxas. O banco central tem que subir as taxas antes que a entrada de dinheiro comece a gerar inflação no consumidor.
A probabilidade de a bolha rebentar não dissuade a especulação. A especulação é racional desde que os ganhos compensem o risco de a bolha rebentar.
Lástima que o JM ainda nao chegou ao conceito de “variaveis nao previstas”.
No caso da votação de ontem no Congresso foi que 67% dos repressentantes voltaram para atrás no apoio ao plano do seu presidente.
No caso da bolha que rebenta ou nao rebenta no cenario do JM para o seu post CRASH a pesar do banco central nao subir taxas chamase “crédito sub-prime”.
Nunca deviam ter proposto aquele plano. Os políticos é que são xonés.
GostarGostar
Cliche’ de esquerda? Nos ultimos tempo, o CAA e’ que publicou uma serie de posts a defender o primado da politico sobre o economico, nao foi?
GostarGostar
É mais fácil matar o mensageiro!
GostarGostar
Main Street Pans Bailout, Says Bankers Get `What They Deserve’
By Chris Dolmetsch
Sept. 30 (Bloomberg) — Main Street thinks even less of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout plan than the U.S. House of Representatives, which defeated it yesterday.
“This thing they’re talking about is only going to make the rich richer,” said Paul Clancy, 30, a window washer who for 15 years has scrubbed panes on some of Boston’s largest financial edifices. “Leave them be, and they’ll get what they deserve. Nobody helps me if I’m in trouble.”
The plan would benefit “a bunch of rich good old boys,” said Seattle bicycle messenger Mark Pilder, 39, on a break from his downtown deliveries. “They’re not going to lose money. They’re shifting the burden to taxpayers. The ones actually making the decisions aren’t in danger of losing any money.”
Pilder said he may lose business from the global credit crisis because many of his deliveries go to the headquarters of Washington Mutual Inc., which was taken over by the federal government last week in the largest bank failure in U.S. history.
In Wilmington, street vendor Jeff Buckwalter, 55, said he agreed that a bailout is needed but, “I can’t just see giving Wall Street $700 billion.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a5LgXsmYi6OU&refer=home
GostarGostar
LA-C,
nem mais!
GostarGostar
JM a tentar carimbar CAA.
GostarGostar
E qual é o problema? Assim é que está bem.
GostarGostar
.
Alguém anda muito confuso: o Congresso não é POLITICA ?
GostarGostar
Não vejo em que seja um cliché de esquerda. Parece mais uma asneira à Mário Soares.
GostarGostar
A bolha rebenta quando o banco central sobe as taxas. O banco central tem que subir as taxas antes que a entrada de dinheiro comece a gerar inflação no consumidor.
A probabilidade de a bolha rebentar não dissuade a especulação. A especulação é racional desde que os ganhos compensem o risco de a bolha rebentar.
Lástima que o JM ainda nao chegou ao conceito de “variaveis nao previstas”.
No caso da votação de ontem no Congresso foi que 67% dos repressentantes voltaram para atrás no apoio ao plano do seu presidente.
No caso da bolha que rebenta ou nao rebenta no cenario do JM para o seu post CRASH a pesar do banco central nao subir taxas chamase “crédito sub-prime”.
GostarGostar