Saltar para o conteúdo

kit mãos-livres

22 Março, 2011

«Ironically, one of the reasons many people supported the call for a no-fly zone was the fear that if Gaddafi managed to crush the Libyan people”s uprising and remain in power, it would send a devastating message to other Arab dictators: Use enough military force and you will keep your job.

.

Instead, it turns out that just the opposite may be the result: It was after the UN passed its no-fly zone and use-of-force resolution, and just as US, British, French and other warplanes and warships launched their attacks against Libya, that other Arab regimes escalated their crack-down on their own democratic movements.

.

In Yemen, 52 unarmed protesters were killed and more than 200 wounded on Friday by forces of the US-backed and US-armed government of Ali Abdullah Saleh. It was the bloodiest day of the month-long Yemeni uprising. President Obama “strongly condemned” the attacks and called on Saleh to “allow demonstrations to take place peacefully”.

.

But while a number of Saleh”s government officials resigned in protest, there was no talk from Saleh”s US backers of real accountability, of a travel ban or asset freeze, not even of slowing the financial and military aid flowing into Yemen in the name of fighting terrorism.

.

Similarly in US-allied Bahrain, home of the US Navy”s Fifth Fleet, at least 13 civilians have been killed by government forces. Since the March 15 arrival of 1,500 foreign troops from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, brought in to protect the absolute power of the king of Bahrain, 63 people have been reported missing.

.

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, said: “We have made clear that security alone cannot resolve the challenges facing Bahrain. Violence is not the answer, a political process is.”

.

But she never demanded that foreign troops leave Bahrain, let alone threatened a no-fly zone or targeted air strikes to stop their attacks.» (Aljazeera)

5 comentários leave one →
  1. Piscoiso's avatar
    22 Março, 2011 14:47

    Impor a democracia à bomba, parece contraditório e sobretudo hipócrita, quando se verifica que esse critério só é seguido onde há petróleo ou outras riquezas naturais.
    Por outro lado, a “no-fly zone”, presta-se a muitas conjecturas.
    Destruídos todos os aviões da Líbia, deixa de ser necessária?
    E se a Líbia não tivesse aviões, que “no zone” iriam instituir?

    Gostar

  2. lucklucky's avatar
    lucklucky permalink
    22 Março, 2011 15:04

    Continuam os pobres argumentos do Gabriel.
    Mortos no Yemen acontecem regularmente. E os Sauditas – tal como pelo outro lado membros do Heezbalah libanês disfarçados de Cristãos – já estavam no Bahrain.
    .
    Pisco. A no-fly zone é falsa, aliás não é isso que foi escrito – mas como foi vendido-. Já foram atacados alvos terrestres como tanques e artilharia auto-propulsada.

    Gostar

  3. lucklucky's avatar
    lucklucky permalink
    22 Março, 2011 15:08

    Pelo menos 4 destes foram destruídos pela aviação.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmaria_(artillery)

    Gostar

  4. lucklucky's avatar
    lucklucky permalink
    22 Março, 2011 15:15

    Para lembrar a hipocrisia de Obama, numa crítica que o Gabriel fez com a qual concordo:
    .
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-president-does-not-have-power-unde
    .
    Obama em 2007: “President Does Not Have Power Under Constitution to Unilaterally Authorize a Military Attack”
    .
    Suficiente para Impeachment…

    Gostar

  5. Arlindo da Costa's avatar
    Arlindo da Costa permalink
    22 Março, 2011 16:48

    O Huno francês e o Camarão da Inglaterra falida, deviam ser pendurados num poste de luz em Tripoli!
    Nunca a Europa desceu tão baixo.
    Shame, cangalheiros da Europa, do Ocidente e da «Civilização»!

    Gostar

Deixe uma resposta para Piscoiso Cancelar resposta